这部分案例均在联邦巡回法庭上诉成功，并由Parish Patience Immigration Lawyers完成。按照下文排列顺序，依次为：
Administrative Appeals Tribunal – Partner Residence (Class VS) visa – Partner (Temporary) (Class UK) visa –the Tribunal failed to consider compelling reasons at the time of the decision –– jurisdictional error found – application allowed.
Protection Visa –Administrative Appeals Tribunal – The Tribunal failed to consider whether the Applicant's activities in Australia might become known in India giving rise to a real risk of serious harm to him and failed to consider the claim under the Complementary Protection ground – jurisdictional error found – writs issued.
SZVGP v Minister for Immigration & Anor  FCCA 3210 (13 December 2016)
Protection Visa – Application to review decision of Refugee Review Tribunal – Tribunal denied the Applicant procedural fairness by not taking evidence from a witness in a manner that was unreasonable and not based on any logical foundation- The Tribunal fell into jurisdictional error and denied the Applicant procedural fairness by failing to advise him that he was entitled to refuse to answer questions in a manner that might breach legal professional privilege- jurisdictional error found – writs issued.
MIGRATION – Application for Student (Temporary)(Class TU) visa – review of decision of Migration Review Tribunal – whether the Tribunal misunderstood the meaning of “substantial part” in cl.5A407 of the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) – whether the Tribunal misunderstood the meaning of “leading to” in cl.5A407 – jurisdictional error– writs issued.
MIGRATION – Application for judicial review of decision of Refugee Review Tribunal (Tribunal) affirming decision of a delegate of the first respondent not to grant applicant protection visa – whether Tribunal erroneously determined applicant retracted fundamental element of the applicant’s claims – whether the Tribunal made jurisdictional error by so finding – jurisdictional error found.